|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 09/09/07 01:35
Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>
>> Michael Fesser wrote:
>>> At least some months if you don't want to break old links. In theory it
>>> should be kept forvever.
>> Some redirects are unavoidable. And redirecting some pages for a few
>> months is much better than wasting CPU cycles forever.
>>
>> Oh, and yes. Yahoo is SUCH an expert on these things. ROFLMAO!
>
> I guess you didn't even read it. There are other reports on the net
> available about the traffic caused by unnecessary redirects.
>
Yes, I read it. A bunch of tripe.
Yea, more of your "experts"? It's someone's opinion. That's it. They
are not recognized by W3C, ICANN or even any major college or
university. IOW - they're completely without credibility.
>>>> It wouldn't have been necessary if the files had been named correctly in
>>>> the first place. And the sooner a bad decision like this is corrected,
>>>> the better it will be.
>>> Correct. No .php in URLs.
>> No one else shares your views.
>
> Wrong.
>
> Micha
OK, let me rephrase that. No one with any sense agrees with you.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|