|
|
Posted by Steve on 09/12/07 03:13
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:3_2dnRvfUIiaxXrbnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
>> news:MNHFi.2377$Sd4.1809@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>> Jim Carlock wrote:
>>>
>>>> And I'm wondering why PHP says .net support = enabled where
>>>> ..net is NOT installed. I'm baffled by this one. It appears PHP
>>>> looks for one specific file and it exists, PHP declares .net
>>>> enabled, but .net is actually at least a 50MB package of files
>>>> which fill a few folders.
>>> I seem to recall something from the docs in which the PHP folks
>>> strangely note that this is just a place-holder for something they hope
>>> to have PHP doing in the future.
>>
>> again, your recall is weak and with a little investigation on your part,
>> you could keep yourself from embarasment. the documentation simply states
>> that:
>>
>> ======
>> This extension is EXPERIMENTAL. The behaviour of this extension --
>> including the names of its functions and anything else documented about
>> this extension -- may change without notice in a future release of PHP.
>> Use this extension at your own risk.
>>
>> ======
>>
>> now, does that sound *ANYTHING* like what you just dribbled from your
>> keyboard?
>>
>>> It's kinda like building a car with a sticker where the gas gauge should
>>> be.
>>
>> more like an example of the twainian proverb:
>>
>> It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a
>> fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
>>
>> which is what the bulk of your posts consist of...opening your yap and
>> removing all doubt.
>
> You should take your own advice, Steve. Sanders is more right about it
> than you are.
i usually do. so, in what way(s) is this so?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|