|
|
Posted by Paul Furman on 09/12/07 17:42
J.O. Aho wrote:
> Paul Furman wrote:
>
>>What is needed for mobile browser compatibility? This is in regards to
>>Google ads. It seems the page in my sig just needs to be able to
>>reformat the table listing for each item into a stacked list rather than
>>the wide table, everything else will scrinch down to a tiny window and
>>there already is an option to turn off the long descriptions and
>>associated images or are images already turned off?
>
> Depends on which mobiles you want to support, we can make a simple definition
> of mobile browsers, group 1 that supports wml only and group 2 xhtml browsers.
>
> The 2nd group is quite similar to browser xhtml, but is a lot less forgiving
> for microsoft type of coding (open tags may make the page not work at all,
> even cause the mobile browser to crash).
>
> The 1st group don't support much, only 2bit images, in best case and no clue
> about things you have in xhtml.
>
> You should check the cellular phone model and adjust the code to a level which
> it will manage, or make the page so simple that any cellular should be able to
> understand all the tags.
>
> I can say I'm quite bored of mobile browser compatibility and would be happy
> if I hadn't to care about those, but work is work...
Ow, sounds like a mess. It's not that important to us really. Is there
maybe a simulator to see what it would look like?
--
Paul Furman Photography
http://edgehill.net
Bay Natives Nursery
http://www.baynatives.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|