|
|
Posted by Paul Furman on 09/12/07 18:19
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Paul Furman wrote:
>
>>What is needed for mobile browser compatibility? This is in regards to
>>Google ads. It seems the page in my sig
>
> Google ads? I don't see any google ads on the page in your sig (now
> snipped because it was in your sig).
The goal is to qualify for advertising through google in their mobile
compatible listings. I never click the things but I guess people do. In
fact I've got them blocked, I can't even see them.
>>just needs to be able to reformat the table listing for each item into
>>a stacked list rather than the wide table, everything else will
>>scrinch down to a tiny window and there already is an option to turn
>>off the long descriptions and associated images or are images already
>>turned off?
>
> I looked at the page with Opera (press Shift-F11) and it works fine in
> that pseudo-display.
OK thanks. Assuming you are talking about a stripped down text only version.
> Could you phrase your question better? I am not
> sure what you want.
http://www.google.com/mobile/
http://services.google.com/adwords/mobile_ads?hl=en
They don't describe much there but we got this email:
> We are happy to announce a new feature that will allow you to
> easily reach additional qualified customers who are searching
> Google from their mobile phones.
>
> In the next few days, your search ads will be eligible to run on
> Google Mobile Search pages (like they currently do on Google.com).
> We are offering this feature - and any resulting clicks - for
> free through November 18, so you can experiment with the rapidly
> growing mobile platform while still reaching qualified customers.
>
> Each ad's eligibility will be determined by its landing page and
> only ads with landing pages that can be adapted for viewing on
> mobile browsers will be shown. You can monitor each ad's
>
> performance via a special performance tracking page within your
> account called "Performance Data: Search Ads on Google Mobile
> Search."
> If it were my site, I would not have such a loooong main page that takes
> awhile to load. I would list links of Categories, each to a separate
> page of particular plants fitting that category. There seems to be about
> 70 <table>s of plants, well beyond convenient scrolling/reading.
Yes, it is a bear to load but at least you can start reading from the
top. Loading the full list is really a killer, the opening page is just
featured plants. Re-reading that email above, I think you are right, the
landing page will be way too large to be compatible.
--
Paul Furman Photography
http://edgehill.net
Bay Natives Nursery
http://www.baynatives.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|