|
|
Posted by Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 09/12/07 19:33
Paul Furman wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> Paul Furman wrote:
>>> What is needed for mobile browser compatibility? This is in regards
>>> to Google ads. It seems the page in my sig
>>
>> Google ads? I don't see any google ads on the page in your sig (now
>> snipped because it was in your sig).
>
> The goal is to qualify for advertising through google in their mobile
> compatible listings. I never click the things but I guess people do.
> In fact I've got them blocked, I can't even see them.
So do I (block them), but I looked through your source for them; found
none.
>> I looked at the page with Opera (press Shift-F11) and it works fine
>> in that pseudo-display.
>
> OK thanks. Assuming you are talking about a stripped down text only
> version.
Of Opera? No, the latest graphical version 9.23. Load your page and
press Shift-F11.
<snip google stuff>
>> If it were my site, I would not have such a loooong main page that
>> takes awhile to load. I would list links of Categories, each to a
>> separate page of particular plants fitting that category. There
>> seems to be about 70 <table>s of plants, well beyond convenient
>> scrolling/reading.
>
> Yes, it is a bear to load but at least you can start reading from the
> top. Loading the full list is really a killer, the opening page is
> just featured plants. Re-reading that email above, I think you are
> right, the landing page will be way too large to be compatible.
People not on broadband will get jerky scrolling if they try to start
reading while it is still loading.
According to: http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/
your page is currently 493238 bytes (!), and will require two minutes or
more for someone on a (really good) dialup connection.
--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|