|
|
Posted by dorayme on 09/13/07 01:18
In article <7d464$46e88685$40cba7b5$3248@NAXS.COM>,
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
> > In a moment of weakness, staring at unmanageable numbers of
> > pictures on my machine, I thought to take a peek on the auto web
> > photo generator in PS CS. Some of the options generated quite
> > good enough looking albums - at least off line in most browsers.
> >
> > One can fiddle about with the template html files provided (there
> > are just very few (this is prior to any actual generation). These
> > files contain bits and pieces that the inbuilt generator latches
> > onto to do its thing. I managed to remove a lot of table based
> > code as an experiment and this was encouraging. But a lot of the
> > stuff is based on iframes and much else that it would be nice to
> > be rid of.
> >
> > I suspect it is a bit of a lost cause but just wondered if anyone
> > has done anything interesting to make PS CS generate half decent
> > accessible web pages to a higher standard?
> >
>
> Don't know about PS CS but if your dump the preset template in IrfanView
> you can make a custom template with HTML strict + CSS (I have for a
> CD-ROM project) for a much better price than PS, like $0.00
If it is Mac compatible I will try it (I faintly recall it *not*
being so ages ago). I suppose I could use my Winbox. Radical
thought!
If anyone has used a Mac compatible generator that is template
customisable (not just with some options but with user being able
to write the html and css without roadblocks), would not mind
hearing about it.
(btw. ... not a better price if you already use PS).
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|