|
|
Posted by Michael Fesser on 09/14/07 20:44
..oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>Michael Fesser wrote:
>> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>>
>>> Yep, you are an idiot if you think they didn't attack us. Some reminders:
>>> [...]
>>
>> How many people in the world were killed by US soldiers? Or by US
>> weapons thrown into a fight to make some money and to "protect" the US
>> economical interests? How many people suffer from starvation and poverty
>> because the US is exploiting their land or restricting their trading?
>
>How many innocent civilians?
Not many. Just some millions. Nothing special.
>Far fewer than those killed every day by
>the terrorists.
Sure.
>> What good have the US done to the world in the last decades?
>
>We've made it safer.
With war. Sure.
> Just like we did in WW II.
Yes, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were absolutely safe after it was all over.
>> Bush is one of the worst terrorist himself. A dangerous criminal Texan
>> cowboy with a big daddy and a lot of money behind him.
>
>ROFLMAO! We finally have a President with enough balls to stand up to
>the terrorists.
Elected by courts, not by the people. Started at least two new wars.
Tries to restrict even _our_ European civil rights. Spits on freedom and
personal rights. Failed to support his own people during natural
disasters, at the same time ignores or even suppresses environmental
protection issues. And many more ...
Wow, what a president. You can be really proud of him.
>>> If we would have
>>> had that in 1993, we wouldn't be in this situation today.
>>
>> Correct. It could be even worse.
>
>Nope, it would be much better.
You mean then the US would even more rule the world than they do now.
Maybe they would already have taken over and "freed" old Europe?
>> The only reason to invade Iraq was the oil. When was the war finished
>> "officially"? What's the situation now? Worse than ever.
>>
>
>You really believe that, huh? It was NOTHING about oil.
Of course it was all just about a little ugly dictator and his WMD toys.
But OK, oil was not the _only_ reason.
>Or, maybe you
>can prove it.
You can find enough resources in the web if you _want_ to find them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War
And before you laugh at Wikipedia or deny their credibility - there are
more than 150 references for all the claims and statements made in that
article. "Oil" is a major section in it - and it is proved.
I wonder if you really mean what you say or if you're just trolling and
stress testing our irony detectors.
Micha
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|