|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 09/15/07 19:04
Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>
>> Michael Fesser wrote:
>>> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>>>
>>>> How many innocent civilians?
>>> Not many. Just some millions. Nothing special.
>> Yes? And you have some proof of that? Or are you just talking out your
>> ass? I suspect the latter.
>
> Of course you do, because offending people is the only you can do. Not
> only here, but in nearly every third thread. Everyone who doesn't agree
> with you or doesn't want to sleep with your president in his Or^Hval
> Office is a troll, an ass hole or something like that.
>
Yea, right. I call them like I see them. It has nothing to do with not
agreeing with my President. It has everything to do with the likes of
you arguing things like the Russians taking over East Germany and trying
to compare that to the war in Iraq.
But if you don't see the difference, it shows your lack of intelligence.
And people who butt into a thread with that kind of shit are trolls.
OTOH, I don't mind a real conversation with real facts.
> When God handed out social competence, was it you who shouted the
> loudest "Not me, not me!"?
>
>> Try again - with some real facts.
>>
>> And he isn't doing a thing to _your_ European civil rights. And all the
>> rest of your statements are full of even more crap.
>>
>> I really suggest you get some facts before you pull your head out of
>> your ass again.
>
> As I said - you could find proof if you _want_ to find it (for all the
> things I said). There are enough resources available. But of course
> since they are just websites written by one person or maybe a few, they
> don't have any credibility and are not worth the bytes. In fact the only
> real source of truth is whitehouse.gov. Sorry, I should have known that.
>
You made the claim. You show the proof. And do it with real facts, not
claims made on some web site.
> Just wondering - if the US would ever get a black president - would he
> leave the White House as it is?
>
Another irrelevant remark.
>>> You can find enough resources in the web if you _want_ to find them.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War
>> And you think that's the truth? ROFLMAO. It's ONE PERSON'S (or maybe a
>> few people's) opinion.
>
> I wouldn't call 150 references "a few people's opinions". And obviously
> you think that even Amnesty International, Washington Post, CNN, BBC,
> CBS, UN and whatever they're called don't have any credibility.
>
Let's see..
Amnesty International - a liberal organization.
The Washington ComPost - a junk paper. I know first hand - I get it
every day. 1/2 the stuff they print about the war and the president is
misleading or just plain wrong.
CNN - another liberal "source" full of inaccuracies - which can be proven.
BBC - no idea, I don't listen to them.
CBS - more of the same.
UN - a bunch of wimps.
For instance - CNN and the NY Times (another liberal paper) did a
complete recount of Florida after the 2000 election. Guess what? Bush
still won. But did they say anything about it? Not a chance.
When you only look at one side, you get a biased opinion. Try the other
side for a change - Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh, for instance. Facts
you never hear "reported" by the liberal media.
>> I could write an article in wikipedia saying Michael Fesser is a horses
>> ass. It would have more creditability that what you're pointing out.
>
> Of course you can do that, I don't have a problem with that.
> Of course you would also have to accept the consequences.
>
What consequences? It's on the internet. It must be the truth.
>> But I forget - you believe everything you read on the internet.
>
> Obviously you believe everything you see on TV. And just in case you
> still live back in the 1850's - even reputable and credible news paper
> magazines, scientific articles and such are available on the net. You
> just have to know _where_ to search.
>
Not at all. However, unlike you, I listen to *both sides*. And I've
seen just how "credible" some of your "sources" are.
>>> And before you laugh at Wikipedia or deny their credibility - there are
>>> more than 150 references for all the claims and statements made in that
>>> article. "Oil" is a major section in it - and it is proved.
>> Yep, and how "accurate" are those references? Most are other websites
>> with just as little credibility.
>
> I knew you would say that.
>
>> And hey - I didn't bring up the topic.
>
> Neither did I. I just can't stand your damn arrogance and egoism.
>
So? Tough shit. You know what? I really don't give a damn.
>> And no one asked you to stick
>> your fat ass in here.
>>
>> If there's anyone who's a troll, it's you.
>
> Thanks for that, old man. If arrogance would squeak, you would have to
> walk around with an oil can all day.
>
> Micha
And if you needed a brain to go around the world, you wouldn't be able
to get around the block.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|