|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 09/18/07 16:01
NoDude wrote:
> Ahem... I have a feeling I'll get shot, stabbed and hung for this,
> buuuuuut... There's really no need for require_once in __autoload,
> because if you've reached the __autoload function, the class is
> obviously not present (no sense making php check for it a second
> time). Also, if you're including from the same directory, use './'.
> $class_name.'.php', that way php won't look in the includes paths.
>
No, you're correct, there's no reason to use require_once if you use
autoload.
OTOH, while require_once means you need to add another statement to your
code, the execution is faster. And it will work on any system - i.e. a
shared host with autoload disabled.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|