|
|
Posted by rf on 09/19/07 02:19
"Ed Mullen" <ed@edmullen.net> wrote in message
news:CM-dnXOOEsmHGW3bnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d@comcast.com...
> rf wrote:
>> "Paul Furman" <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote in message
>> news:47%Hi.9082$z_5.811@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>> Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2007-09-17, bizshop wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, and I could change 2007-06-24 to 6-24-07
>>>>> No need for the dashes - and 20070624.is ISO proper.
>>>> ISO requires the dashes, and it is 2007-06-24 not the nonsensical
>>>> 6-24-07.
>>> I've got both systems now. 6-24-07 is what I'm most comfortable with
>>
>> You might be but less that 5% of the planet uses that format. The other
>> 95% will wonder what the 24th month of the year is.
>>
>
> So, 95% of the planet is too stupid to figure it out? That's a pretty sad
> opinion of most of the world.
Ok, figure this one out:
6/5/07
Are you going to be a nearly month late for your meeting?
--
Richard.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|