You are here: Re: SELECT * vs SELECT col1, col2 « MsSQL Server « IT news, forums, messages
Re: SELECT * vs SELECT col1, col2

Posted by Serge Rielau on 09/19/07 21:45

Erland Sommarskog wrote:
> Hugo Kornelis (hugo@perFact.REMOVETHIS.info.INVALID) writes:
>> For SELECT *, the first step in parsing is to find out which columns are
>> in the table. That requires a read on the syscolumns system table in SQL
>> Server 2000, or it's undocumented equivalent in SQL Server 2005. That in
>> itself means that you'll have a small bit of overhead, due to requesting
>> a lock, getting it, reading the data, and releasing the lock again.
>
> But if you list all columns in the table, the optimizer still has to
> read all rows in sys.columns for the table verify that all columns
> exists, to find their data types etc. So the amount of locking would be
> the same.
Uhmm.. I don't think I'd want to confuse the official information schema
with what the DBMS uses for itself. You assume there is neither
compacting of the decomposed information into one object (like a LOB)
nor caching of the schema in memory.

Cheers
Serge
--
Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  статьи на английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Сайт изготовлен в Студии Валентина Петручека
изготовление и поддержка веб-сайтов, разработка программного обеспечения, поисковая оптимизация