|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 09/19/07 22:15
Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:msOdnYNUlZJZLXLbnZ2dnUVZ_tCrnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>>>>> But it seems that the same people who are stupid and irresponsible
>>>>> enough to vote themselves a tax break when there's an outstanding and
>>>>> past-due, mutli-generational debt to pay...
>>>> Yea, and you know what? After that tax break, the economy improved, and
>>>> federal tax revenue INCREASED. You need to go back to Economics 101.
>>> I CLEP'd Eco101 and 102.
>> Then you need to go back to school.
>>
>>> Where your logic fails is in your use of just ONE side of the economic
>>> equation.
>>>
>> And which side is that, Sanders? It must be the same side every
>> recognized economics expert in the world is on, though, so I guess I'm in
>> good company.
>
> uhhhh...hummmm (trying not to laugh).
>
> well, our friend alan and most other economists like levitt and company,
> clearly see two sides to manipulating and predicting ecomonomic states.
> being that you're such an expert (really holding it in now) on the matter, i
> find it a bit odd that you don't know that sanders is talking about the
> supply side rather than the demand side...duely recognizing that either is
> typically and respectively the sole target of republicans and democrats.
>
> me thinks the 'side' your standing on now is the one where the crickets can
> clearly be heard chirping.
>
> (now letting loose the supressed hilarity)
>
>
No, I understand what he's saying. But the two sides are not separate.
They are intimately intertwined. Without one, the other is worthless.
And you cannot consider one without the other.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|