|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 09/21/07 04:00
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:25:28
GMT Onideus Mad Hatter scribed:
>>Recently I accidently ran-across a new type Flash video which took my
>>fancy, so I transferred it to my 'puter. It was an .flv file, I
>>believe. Anyway, the damn thing refused to run no matter what I did,
>>making it virtually worthless to me and all my progeny. Ergo, my
>>statement, and furthermore, if your idea of the future is things that
>>don't work, I can see why you wear diapers.
>
> ...so because you're an ignorant fucking retard who was clinging to
> antediluvian diapers you didn't bother to invest the, what, 58 seconds
> worth of effort in Google to find out about, what was it your stupid
> ass called it again, oh yes, "a new type of Flash video" (believe me,
> all those in the know are laughing our asses off right now).
>
> Here, let me take the time to educate you, because obviously Google is
> just WAY too hard for you, innt? FLV is just a container format for
> Flash video...that's it, nothin fancier than that. And it would not
> have taken your stupid ass more than 23 seconds to go and download a
> player capable of handling it. Here, try reading, Shortsighted:
>
> "Flash Video is viewable on most operating systems, via the widely
> available Adobe Flash Player and web browser plugin, or one of several
> third-party programs such as MPlayer, VLC media player, or any player
> which uses DirectShow filters (such as Media Player Classic, Windows
> Media Player, and Windows Media Center) when the ffdshow filter is
> installed."
>
> ...fuckin DUH!
Well, I _said_ I already have Flash 9. So, _you_ are apparently saying
that Flash 9 is not capable of rendering .flv container files at the same
time you are saying that it is. Talk about schizophrenic!
>>>>Flash
>>>>definitely has its place, but Abode is typically and predictably
>>>>undermining that right on schedule.
>>>
>>> See, right there, you don't even know what the hell you're talking
>>> about. Adobe has made much of the Flash development environment
>>> free for the taking and are edging closer and closer to making it
>>> completely open, allowing any third party to easily create their own
>>> Flash content builders. As is the case with such programs like
>>> SwishMax.
>
>>Ah, Adobe is neither your friend nor mine; they're in it to make
>>mo<COCK SLAP>
>
> No, you're simply a fuckin retard. You get frustrated because
> technology changes and you don't want to invest the five minutes worth
> of effort to keep up, so instead you just sit there like a dumbfuck
> and blame your lack of knowledge, understanding and IGNORANCE on the
> company makin the product, rather than where the blame ACTUALLY
> lies...which is ON YOU, Sparkles.
Well, you're right in the sense that I don't feel as if I should have to
spend inordinate amounts of time "keeping up" with all the new crap that
comes out which will eventually end up in the trash bin, anyway.
There will always be some demand for animation and other related
dynamics. Whether Flash will ultimately fulfill that need remains to be
seen, but I think it's taken a step backwards with this so-called "new
technology" which certainly don't seem to be worth a shit as far as I can
see.
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|