|
|
Posted by dorayme on 09/22/07 01:57
In article
<46f463aa$0$28214$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,
"asdf" <asdf@asdf.com> wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Poor choice of examples, but you are getting there. Take me, for
> > instance, when I go to a site, it is usually for info and frankly
> > I just want that info in as plain a manner as possible. But that
> > is me. Maybe it is others too, but I mean *real plain* for me
> > will do and that is unlikely to be others choice. As often as
> > not, when vanilla is shown here, folks here complain about how
> > plain it is. There are not too many around here, I fancy, that
> > understand where windandwaves is coming from. Go read my post
> > where I lament about his not being able to marry his design goals
> > with a more fluid implementation. This is not a silly and
> > ignorant dismissal of his goals.
> >
> [snip]
>
> Simple. If you don't like what you see, and you like a plain look, just tell
> your browser that you want it plainer. TAKE CONTROL.
Perhaps there is a misunderstanding here? I was saying something,
not asking for advice.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|