|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 09/26/07 06:41
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:32:39
GMT asdf scribed:
>> When we know that the implicit assumptions of a question are wrong,
>> then it is surely relevant to address them. You might decide not to
>> answer at all, but if you do, why would you answer under assumptions
>> that are known to be wrong?
>>
>> It is virtually certain that the employee or author does not know
>> "this stuff". If you read the original question with open eyes, this
>> should become obvious.
>>
>> --
>> Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
>> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
>
> for once, i agree with jukka :)) Nice one!
I'll bet it doesn't become a habit...
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|