|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 09/28/07 03:41
Steve wrote:
> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
> news:V1NKi.37164$RX.1442@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
>> "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote in message
>> news:4QuKi.8$M31.2@newsfe06.lga...
>>> "Shelly" <sheldonlg.news@asap-consult.com> wrote in message
>>>> Why????? That, to me, is like looking at a big console radio and
>>>> expecting to see the show. Why type? Why not simply TALK? OK, I can
>>>> see one reason. That would be to send a message if the person isn't
>>>> answering. Then, again, isn't that what voicemail is for?
>>> nah, that's so they can 'talk' during class or church or whatever else of
>>> benefit they should be engaged in. it also costs less than actually
>>> talking.
>> Oh, MAN does my niece ever wish THAT were true.
>> Our calling program charged something like 10cents for every message.
>> At first, some days, she'd text back-and-forth 20+ times in a day.
>> She spent her entire first Starbucks paycheck on that.
>
> 2 bucks?
>
> (just play'n)
>
>
Right over his head, Steve :-)
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|