|
|
Posted by Mtr on 10/02/07 16:30
let's try again: there is absolutely no confusion introduced here, where no
scrolling is required, by top posting. Don't use inappropriate theoreticals
where they do not matter.
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:20:32 +0200, "Rik Wasmus"
<luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:12:39 +0200, Mtr <Mtr@no.spam> wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:43:24 +0200, "Rik Wasmus"
>> <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> explain how any of that applies to this method of reply, dumbass?
>
>Because when I did not have the original post, I'd have to read you post
>as an outline of the ongoing discussion. Which means I'd have to scroll
>down the post (possibly scroll down for that again if it's a longer text),
>scroll a little bit up, read down again, and repeat that untill I finally
>know what 'any of that' in you reply really stands for.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|