|
|
Posted by Travis Newbury on 10/06/07 16:16
On Oct 5, 4:45 pm, Mark Goodge <use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk>
wrote:
> >I like pizazz
> As a website operator, I like making money. I like making money more
> than I like pizazz. So I'll stick with primarily textual sites.
Making money sometimes requires pizazz. Would you use Flash if it
made you more money?
I work in the Entertainment and Education/Training world. Plain-ol-
text doesn't cut it there. Flash is currently the most popular method
for producing educational CBTs and WBTs. The reason for this is based
on the way people learn. Flash is also the fastest growing media
provider on the web. I think you would be hard pressed to find any
mainstream entertainment site (TV, Movie, Music, sports including
personallity sites) that does not take advantage of Flash.
Also, Flash and accessibility are not mutually exclusive. Neither are
search engines and Flash. The problem is that most older Flash out
there was garbage and has given Flash a bad name. Evidence of this is
the completely silly things people in this forum say about Flash.
Most people (experts?) in this group haven't a clue what you can do
with Flash. When ever I hear someone saying how bloated, inaccessible,
and useless it is, I know they haven't a clue and are either basing
their opinion on something they remember from years ago, or they just
mindlessly mimic what every they here the ignorant say about Flash not
using their own brain at all. (A lot of that here)
Flash, multimedia, and the web are a marriage made in heaven.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|