Posted by dorayme on 10/06/07 22:57

In article
<1191688677.951356.316570@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Travis Newbury <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Oct 5, 6:29 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > In article
> > <1191605468.768652.27...@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> > Travis Newbury <TravisNewb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Oct 5, 9:31 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net> wrote:
> > > > ??? When, where? The statement may be true for those over-bloated
> > > > image-slice sites or MS Publisher abortions, but no graphics is going to
> > > > undercut text for bandwidth.
> >
> > > And we all know how much fun an all text website can be...
> >
> > Do we?
> >
> > --
> > dorayme
>
> I do

Here is a little "website", I made an index especially for you
Travis, use your back button between reads and tell me honestly
if you did not absolutely split your sides for minutes on end:

http://dorayme.150m.com/jokes/jokesIndex.html

--
dorayme

• Next in forum: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news
• Prev in forum: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news
• Thread view: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news

[Reply to this message]