|
|
Posted by Mark Goodge on 10/07/07 18:03
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 10:46:48 -0700, Travis Newbury put finger to
keyboard and typed:
>On Oct 6, 3:10 pm, Mark Goodge <use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk>
>wrote:
>> On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:16:54 -0000, Travis Newbury put finger to
>> >Making money sometimes requires pizazz. Would you use Flash if it
>> >made you more money?
>> Yes, but I have come across no situations where it would. Can you give
>> examples of Flash-built sites which are primary money earners?
>
>I already did.
No, you haven't. You haven't posted any URLs at all so far in this
thread.
> Virtually any entertainment site, any news site, any
>sports site, and any educational (WBT) site.
No news or sports sites that I use are Flash-based. Some of them use
Flash for some applications, but none of them use it in places where
standard text and graphics are more appropriate.
>You pick it they are all
>using Flash.
Some of them use Flash. Not all.
> And they use flash because that is what the users all
>want.
Bollocks. To take one example, the most popular news website in the
world only ues Flash in some very limited aplications (quizzes,
mostly). To remove them would hardly damage the site at all.
> They would abandon the site if they removed the flash. Flash
>content as well as Flash as a means to host other content is what they
>come for. And all the sites make money
>
>> >I work in the Entertainment and Education/Training world. Plain-ol-
>> >text doesn't cut it there. Flash is currently the most popular method
>> >for producing educational CBTs and WBTs.
>>
>> Not in my field. What's your specialisation?
>
>My specialty is video and video presentation.
Well, duh. Have you thought about what works best for people who don't
just want to present what they make?
Mark
--
Blog: http://Mark.Goodge.co.uk Photos: http://www.goodge.co.uk
"When your thoughts are too expensive to ever want to keep"
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|