|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 10/07/07 17:51
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:25:36 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
<brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote:
>> Watch your mouth, you stupid kid, you don't have any fuckin cl00 as to
>> the extent of what I've done to people online:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.flame/msg/7c40a63eea26ff44
>Teasy today?
I just want to make sure you comprehend what you're dealing with
before you make some really stupid fuckin mistake (like the last
d00d). You've been feigning thick skin, but I wonder how thick it
really goes. Most people draw the line at some point...and I very
frequently have a tendency to cross those lines. So I'm basically
just telling you to be aware of just how far over the line I'll go
online.
>I think I struck a nerve =]
Yeah, the one that makes me beat n00b.jobs.
>> Haven't use my Malkavian character in a few years though...pray to
>> whatever God you believe in that I don't ever start again. My
>> Malkavian character makes my Onideus character look like a cute kitten
>> by comparison.
>I look forward to meeting her. Is it a date? I'll pick her up at around
>7:00 tonight.
I'm sure you'd like that.
>>> No, I'm sure the RPG community could manage without your sprite
>>> generator.
>> Considering it's the only one for RPG Maker XP...no, they really
>> couldn't actually.
>You mean that no-one in the world can grasp making sprites in photoshop?
>Hell, you could even do that in MS Paint of you were so inclined.
Sure, if you wanna wind up with something that looks like this:
: http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_PoE/PoEtards_Are_THE_Dumbest_Mother_Fuckers.png
Free cl00, Dipshit, Photoshop isn't some magixal program that can just
churn out teh uber graphics with nothing more than a few clicks of the
mouse. It requires SKILL and ABILITY. Some of the custom parts I've
made for the generator took HOURS to construct. And even reworking
existing parts to work on my models takes upwards of an hour per.
Creating the layer splits and testing adds on yet another half hour.
>> Oh you sad little fool.
>I'm quite happy today, thank you.
How much Xanax are you taking? LOL
>>> Flash is not good as a primary design element.
>> Actually Flash is the perfect user front end. It's the most cross
>> compatible solution that currently exists and the number of features
>> it supports over other forms is impressive to say the least. It
>> updates extremely easily and most everyone already has it installed
>> since it's needed for all the video type sites (like YouTube) as well
>> as most gaming sites and the like (like Neopets, Zwinky, etc, etc).
>> If the sprite generator was being catered to blind people or the Amish
>> of the Internet (Lynx users and the like), then yeah, it may not be
>> such a great choice, but for the market it's aimed at it's the ideal
>> solution...see, you don't comprehend that though, I mean even after I
>> explain it, you still don't get it, do you? *nods*
>I'm not saying flash isn't useful. Hell, I even use it on my site for
>non-atomic design elements. It should never, ever be relied on, however.
>I bet you never learned that from HTML for Dummies.
Sorry, Dummie, but my knowledge wasn't slurped up from some third
party, it comes directly from my own methodical testing and
experimentation. As far as a user front end...you don't even need
HTML anymore:
: http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/Forum_Template/index.swf
>> The Sprite Generator wasn't made for your type. Now go plow yourself
>> a cornfield you stupid hat wearing, Amish pig fucker.
>L-O-L. You're working yourself up some bad now dear.
L-O-L-L-E-R-C-O-P-T-E-R!!1!!1!!!!
....he's laughing everyone...REALLY. *nods*
>>> I, much the same as anyone who has the sense to leave JS off,
>> There's like 3 other people besides you, and no, I didn't make the
>> Sprite Generator for those three retards either.
>It seems to me that people with more knowledge turn off javascript -
>probably because they check milw0rm daily and realise that 99% of remote
>attacks are in fact script based. Ask your gran if she leaves JS off and
>she'll not have a clue as to what you're talking about.
WRONG!
99.9% of ALL attacks are SE based, social engineering. Even if they
happen to use scripts they STILL require user stupidity to work.
That's why the smarter people don't disable javascript, because
they're not dumb enough to fall for stupid SE tricks. And as you
said, everyone else just ignores the problem.
>Also, why do you need JS to load a flash object?
I don't, but it's needed for other things, like my site tracker that I
plan to put on all my sites.
>>> doesn't find a blank, black page interesting.
>> Of course you find it interesting, you're a stupid fuckin Amish! I
>> mean you don't shut off javascript and Flash unless you're TRYING to
>> limit you user experience. So either you're a fuckin idiot or you
>> LIKE boring, nondescript, plain text garbage.
>Bang on! I do like nondescript, plain text _content_. It provides
>information to me, more so than flashing animations.
And this is where you're shortsighted. You don't comprehend the
concept of using design to enhance the content. Refer to this post:
: http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12516-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34733&messageID=639263&start=-9994
>>> You could make the same thing
>>> using proper (X)HTML better, faster and more extensible.
>> LOL, you stupid retard, you have no idea what you're even talking
>> about (hell your stupid ass probably hasn't even seen it).
>Seen what? XHTML? Dear me, someone hasn't done their research. Google
>dork my name and read my page's source code. I'd like to see what you
>mean when you realise that I use modern Doctypes and language for my
>pages, fonts and colour schemes that are easy on the eye, and will
>render on anything from a V100 terminal to a graphics workstation.
Yeah and none of yer content is worth looking at as a result.
>> The ONLY
>> other thing that it could have possibly been made with was
>> Java...that's it, Java, that's the only other web language available
>> that has color transform matrices (amongst a slew of other stuff
>> that's needed). You could ~possibly~ half-ass it in PHP and
>> javascript, but it'd be WAY inefficient and the home brew color
>> transform matrices wouldn't be nearly as good.
>Errr, your "colour transform matrices" aren't all that complex. I've
>seen your ActionScript and I could write that in 2 hours in PHP.
Then let's see you do it! You run at the mouth pretty good, talkin
shit, claiming how easy it is, so do it, Mouth! Or is pullin shit out
of yer ass all the better you can do?
>> There is absolutely *NO* way you could do it with just straight XHTML,
>> don't be a fuckin retard. Well unless maybe your idea of a sprite
>> generator is one where the parts have static color options and the
>> user has to use print screen to save their finished sprite models.
>> Not to mention no animated preview, or in the next version it's going
>> to have a graphic editing program built directly into it so users can
>> REALLY customize and even create their own parts directly from
>> scratch.
>Chop, chop then! I can't wait for the next black page instalment.
Again, it's not for you.
>> The only thing HTML is good for is displaying simple pictures and
>> text...and it's not even very good at that. Flash supports 32 bit
>> alpha transparent JPEGs fer fuck sake! Not that you have any fuckin
>> clue as to what those are, why you would want to use them and most
>> importantly HOW you would use them. See that really is the basis of
>> everything you're babbling...ignorance.
>Since when did JPEGs have alpha channels? Flash supports sprites that
>are generated from JPEGs and then have an alpha channel applied.
>
>Don't even think about mentioning JPEG2000s - no one uses them and they
>will die away slowly like the internet fad that you are.
Refer to this post:
: http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12516-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34733&messageID=639224&start=-9994
"Support of 32 bit JPEGs (more specifically you can import 32 PNG
files, use JPEG compression on them and Flash will keep the
transparency layer intact)."
>> Of course it's slow you retard, do you have any fuckin idea as to what
>> it's even doing? There's a couple methods I plan to employ in the
>> next version that maybe be able to speed it up a bit, using
>> ByteArray.compress() but ultimately the speed issue is affected most
>> by the number of users who are using it, and, well, that's quite a
>> damn lot:
>> : http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Scraps/Well_That_Aint_Good.png
>>
>> You have understand, Shortsighted, I ain't runnin some tweenage muppet
>> fuck Pokemon fan site with 12 hits a month, collectively my sites get
>> upwards of around a HALF MILLION unique hits every month.
>You mean, like HALF A MILLION? wow! My home computer could handle that.
>And yes I have stress tested way over that.
*pats you on the head*
Sure kid, sure.
>> But then your type isn't much for actually doing your own tests and
>> benchmarking. Pretty much you just slurp up someone else's bullshit
>> and then call it good. Free cl00, that method, it's the MOST CROSS
>> COMPATIBLE WAY of achieving that "portal" look
>No it isn't. That's what _you_ believe is. Simply because you have never
>tried CSS.
WRONG! Again, stupid, I've TRIED ALL EXISTING METHODS and I've tested
them ON ALL MAJOR BROWSERS ON ALL MAJOR OPERATING SYSTEMS...and yer
CSS way breaks on a whole fuckin slew of combinations (like IE on teh
Mac). My way is the MOST cross compatible way that exists, I know
that for a fact because *I* actually tested it myself. I tested all
the other methods too (which is why I know they don't work as well).
>> (vertical and
>> horizontal centering)...well, most cross compatible next to Flash.
>> You can achieve the same effect with Flash and you don't even need
>> HTML code:
>> : http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/Forum_Template/index.swf
>So why don't you just go ahead and serve that to your poor visitors?
I probably will at some point, it's the direction that I'm headed in.
My web design model continually changes and evolves.
>>> 4) You send the whole lot of sprites to the server only for it to just
>>> save the bitmaps as a PNG. All that can be done in PHP
>>
>> Your ignorance is showing once again. Free cl00, you retard, you can
>> alter the individual hue/sat/lightness of object parts and PHP doesn't
>> have any sort of prebuilt color matrices. You could half-ass your own
>> I suppose, but they wouldn't even be as remotely as good as the ones
>> prebuilt into Flash (not to mention they would be slow as fuck in PHP
>> and would eat up a shit load of server resources).
>No actually they don't. I've done colour transforms in PHP and they can
>be made fantastically fast.
Yeah, fantastically fast, limiting and half-ass!
>If you're unhappy about the speed of PHP go
>to C. Actually don't bother, you'll just end up crashing your server.
Yeah, because that plays *SO* nice with other web language forms.
*rolls eyes*
>>> 5) The saving animation actually does nothing at all - it's simply a
>>> sprite. A very pointless, time wasting sprite.
>> Again, Dumbfuck, yer ignorance is showing. The sprite sheet that's
>> generated is for use in the program RPG Maker XP. You import the
>> sprite sheets you create and then use them in your custom made game.
>> They're not for like fuckin avatars or some other kind of tweenage
>> blogger board hoo-ha.
>Sorry.. what? Did I even mention the sprite sheets? No - I meant the
>stupid bar that takes days to scroll across the screen before finally
>sending the data to your PHP.
If you're bitching about the time it takes to save, sorry, but that's
as fast as it can go right now. The next version will be somewhat
faster, I plan to use the Byte.compress() class and some other tricks,
but overall there is no way to REALLY make it uber speedy (or if there
is, no one has developed it yet).
>>> I read them more as entertainment.
>> You're in the minority. They ARE supposed to be read as
>> entertainment, that's the way they're INTENDED, but there's just too
>> damn many retards trying to get themselves up on a cross these days,
>> tryin to play victim 'n shit.
>Is that you reaching out your heart again? I think their may really be
>some love inside there. A trip to the shrink could help.
A trip to the shrink wouldn't make me care about faceless strangers on
the Internet, sorry kiddo.
>>> I now look forward to checking thunderbird for the new
>>> quips you seem to invent. And tell me, how do you have a verbal fire?
>> You're not so good with the metaphors, are you?
>I believe me I am. Just not ones that don't actually have meanings.
Uh huh. You must have some kind of mental disorder if there's no way
you can imagine words having a fire like destruction to them. Where
the fuck do you think the word "flame" (in relation to posts) came
from, you stupid dipshit.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."
"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
with it."
"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."
"There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."
"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."
"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
"People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."
"Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
to their merry little mess."
"There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'."
"How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
"Those who record history are those who control history."
"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."
"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"
"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."
"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|