|
|
Posted by Chaddy2222 on 10/08/07 12:41
SpaceGirl wrote:
> On Oct 8, 10:26 am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-
> sicur...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 6:02 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net> wrote:> Phil Payne wrote:
> > > >> It is not really about processor speed (unless your using an old 486)
> > > >> but connection speed. Yours was broadband. My point is not everyone
> > > >> 'has|can have|will have in the near future' access to broadband.
> >
> > > > But even on broadband - 30 seconds?
> >
> > > > Most users have MUCH shorter fuses and would long since have clicked
> > > > away.
> >
> > > Ohhhh! I see your point. Sorry dialup-mindset. Sometimes I *wish* a page
> > > loaded in 30 seconds!
> >
> > http://www.mortgagenews2.com
> > It's from the same company that SpaceGirl gave the previous example
> > from. It's a shocker though, I mean it should have been done in HTML +
> > CSS for style + PHP / some other server side language for the user
> > account stuff.
>
> Why should it have? Because you don't like Flash?
Not really, it's just that it would have been a lot quicker to develop
useing HTML / CSS and PHP then it would have been useing Flash.
Oh yeah and I would have been able to read the bloody thing.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|