|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 10/09/07 03:07
dorayme wrote:
> In article <DJCdnVHnZs2McpfanZ2dnUVZ_uSgnZ2d@comcast.com>,
> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> dorayme wrote:
>>> In article <zsOdnZjDXe0xf5fanZ2dnUVZ_ozinZ2d@comcast.com>,
>>> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> dorayme wrote:
>>>>> In article <WqKdnWcxftV2XpfanZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
>>>>> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A typical troll - always trying to change the subject when you don't
>>>>>> have a good response.
>>>>> You can profile trolls?
>>>>>
>>>> There are some things common to almost all trolls - like trying to
>>>> change the subject when you pin them down.
>>> You claim that it is a necessary (as distinct from a sufficient
>>> condition)? OK. Let's go along with this for a mo. It still does
>>> not mean Travis is a troll. There needs to be other conditions
>>> too. I am sensitive to any one trying to beat Travis up. I am
>>> possessive about Republicans. If there is a beating to be done of
>>> them, I am badly wanting the job...
>>>
>> That's fine. But if he had an argument, he wouldn't keep trying to
>> claim someone else's opinion was irrelevant and try to change the subject.
>>
>>> Anyway, I think you are quite wrong in a fundamental sense. You
>>> have an unsophisticated view of trolling. My experience is that
>>> the prima facie non-troll folk do the subject changing after the
>>> initial (admittedly trollish) change in the thread. Let me
>>> perfectly blunt: in a troll's sub-branch, I have detected as much
>>> subject changing initiatives among the non trolls as among the
>>> trolls.
>>>
>> Quite frankly, I don't give a damn. I have challenged him ...
>
>
> Ah! Changing the subject!
>
Nope. Brining it back to the original subject, troll.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|