Posted by Tom van Stiphout on 10/09/07 14:25

On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:23:58 -0700, "Artie" <artie2269@yahoo.com>
wrote:

I don't consider SATA suitable for servers. Too many crashes of the
RAID array. Pay the extra money and get a proven technology.

-Tom.


<clip>
>
>I would try to get 15K SCSI drives. Any thoughts on SATA instead of SCSI?
>
>Could I expect much of an impovement by using SQL 2000 Enterprise since it
>can use more RAM? I would rather wait for SQL 2005 to be supported.
>
>Does anyone have a Dell or HP server configured in an email-able cart that
>they would care to share?
>
>Thank you.
>
>

• Next in forum: Re: How to select a word substring in a coumn header from right to left
• Prev in forum: Re: SQL Server does not allow remote connections.
• Thread view: Re: Opinions on SQL Server hardware

[Reply to this message]