|
|
Posted by Steve on 10/09/07 13:56
"Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
news:dmnmg3tq27lpvt3t4ob5mhqeshscv69kvp@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 22:36:06 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>
>>then post the referring message id. as it is, there is no such proof any
>>this thread.
>
> So you're saying there's no such proof because you claim there isn't,
> right, gotcha, carry on, Loser.
>
> While you're at it why don't you run around and look REALLY stupid by
> trying to claim that the earth isn't round. *nods*
there is proof the earth is round-ish, though not a perfect sphere. what you
are doing is claiming you give proof. i'm saying you haven't supplied proof.
idiot.
>>yeah...bloat code that produces very little and is only applicable to
>>certain os' running on specific chipsets.
>
> Wro<COCK SLAP>
>>so, 'perfect liquid' (so i get your jargon correct) from
>>back-oriface-productions (aka shit) is actually diarhea? that would be
>>consistent anyway.
>
> My increasing need for pathetic insults in place of real arguments
> is very telling.
yes, yes it is.
>>> LOL, at this rate yer face is gonna wind up so red you'll be able to
>>> start claiming Native American ancestry.
>
>>your pedestrian quips, though lackluster, are laughable only in their
>>missing wit and humor.
>
> How nice of you to explain why it is you're laughing at me.
thought i'd be polite.
>>> Oh other people have done it...in Flash. I'm the only one whose ever
>>> achieved it using CSS/javascript/PHP.
>
>>he he he. so, others likewise produce gray screens after a large
>>load-time.
>>and yeah, if that's what you're going for, you may as well do it all in
>>html
>>as the others aren't needed for that.
>
> ...and <COCK SLAP>
>>;^)
>
> What the fuck is that supposed to be? A dick nosed smiley?
> Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
it's an accurate character representation of you, based on your pictures.
can i help it if you not only act like a dick, but have a nose for one as
well?
>>> Most people don't know what it is and don't have the capacity to think
>>> outside of their own resolution, that doesn't mean it's not important
>>> though.
>
>>that would be understanding your target market. you aren't curing cancer
>>or
>>solving life's mysteries...importance to you is not needed for them. so,
>>you
>>remain clientless.
>
> You keep confusing yourself with me. I'm the one who has clients,
> Stupid, you're the one who has, well, nothing.
ah...that's why you live in a apartment. gotcha. i see.
> You have no sites, you
> have no clients, you have no skill level, you ain't got shit
again you make claims with no evidence.
hey, did you ever figure out basic memory constructs like bits, bytes,
shifting, and masking...you know, the rudamentary things in programming?
> ...cept
> the crap you keep pulling out of yer ass to try and over-compensate
> for your lack of a cock. Tell us, Stevie, just how small is your
> penis these days?
wow. you seem to be fixated on cock, dick, penis - the whole enchilada. when
you gunna come outta the closet and just admit you want a fat one? that way
you can take your cranium outta your ass and have the real deal instead.
>>further, you'd be one who can't seem to 'think outside of their [your] own
>>resolution' since you think you have a flexible, portable solution all
>>wrapped up in flash, when it is more than sufficiently doable in php and
>>other technologies that actually *are* flexible and portable.
>
> You wouldn't know, Stupid. I do, because I'm the only one to have
> ever created perfect liquid forms in both Flash and AJAX/PHP.
'perfect liquid' is a term known only to OMH...no one else much cares. and
whatever you've created, it blows.
> And the
> later of which is WAY more bloated and slow than the former (even with
> server side image caching).
well, i doubt it's the fault of the language you've used. it's the fault of
the developer's lack of programming skills [read, you]. but hey, at least
you got it to work - a gray box in flash is very impressive. ;^)
>>forget the
>>fact that you go waaaaay out of your way to produce (or try to) a tool
>>that
>>no one will use. as it has been pointed out, a graphics package in most
>>cases is the tool for the job - and that's 'all things being equal' (which
>>it isn't since you lack understanding in graphics and forget to
>>incorporate
>>essentials as part of the output).
>
> Wo<COCK SLAP>
>>> Eventually, all sites will be perfect liquid, especially as
>>> Flash becomes more and more set in stone as the defacto user front end
>>> development platform.
>
>>which will never happen...
>
> Yeah, except for the fact that it is. LOL
proof, numbnuts...proof. let's have the cites.
>>aside from the fact that 'perfect liquid' is
>>something you made up and provides NO benefit to functional use of a
>>website.
>
> Only in your limited comprehension, Junior. You don't even understand
> what "perfect liquid" means, so of course you can't comprehend the
> benefit of such a design.
'perfect liquid' is whatever you say it is...since you made it up. and, i
don't care to know you. and from what i can see of your liquid shit, it's
not something that would benefit anyone else BUT you. so, why bother.
>>flash is a tool.
>
> No junior, YOUR the tool. *nods*
that's Y O U ' R E ... and, you can't nod if nothing is attached to your
neck.
what an idiot.
>>you are trying to make it a be-all-end-all.
>
> What part of "any site you can make in HTML I can make better,
> smaller, faster and more cross compatible with Flash" did you NOT
> comprehend the first time I said it?
oh, the part where flash is not supported on every pc...that's the part that
is hardest to get. followed by the requirement for me to have flash
installed is next. shortly followed by your claim to be able make anything
work, be it html OR flash. i just can't buy off on that idea at all.
>
>>it will never be more than a tool. i'm sure something will come along to
>>outseat html (and it's flavors), however i'm sure it won't resemble flash.
>>it will be lightweight and portable.
>
> LOL, the irony is just...fuckin incredible to say the least. I wonder
> if this stupid retard even has any fuckin cl00 at all as to how
> moronic he keeps sounding.
yawn.
>>> It's basically one of those things that you do
>>> that clients don't need to know about.
>
>>if you wonder why you have no clie<COCK SLAP>
>
> Why woul<COCK SLAP>
> Remember, Stupid...I have clients...you don't.
and they would be?
> My sites make
> money...you have no sites.
sez you. again, you have no proof to support your statement.
> I know what I'm talking about...
apparently not...and not even usually. it is a pure fluke when you do.
> I run
> the fuck at the mouth and pull shit out of my ass.
that's more like it! and, yes, yes you do.
> ...writ<COCK SLAP>
>>> It's like if yer buyin a new
>>> house, you don't necesarily sit there askin about what brand/type of
>>> insulation they used, you just assume that going with someone
>>> reputable means that they won't use the cheapest fuckin shit
>>> available.
>
>>holy hell! you live in a fucking apartment dude! when you spend > $2K or
>>your hard earned cash, you find out what the reputation is of your
>>builder,
>>to whom they subcontract...and yes, you find out what the fuck kind of
>>insulation is being used AND how it's applied - among a great many MORE
>>detailed things you have yet to even assimilate to ask. you assume that
>>'reputable' is akin to what is important to *you* in a house...let me
>>assure
>>you, that is NOT the case.
>
> You obviously don't own a house...because no real estate agent on the
> planet would put up with your bullshit for longer than five minutes.
yes, it is obvious you live in an apartment. real estate agents work for
their client. and, the bigger the price tag, the more they'll put up with.
but hell, even on a $90K house, it's hard for them to pass up $9K just cuz
someone wants specific things.
unlike you, the rest of us can express ourselves without being assholes. we
tell the agent, if one is used, these things are very important to us. if we
don't get them, we'd like to see the price lowered so we can put them at our
expese after the sale. these other things are deal-breakers.
not so hard, is it.
> Pretty much at the point where you start demanding they take up the
> floor boards so you can inspect the foundation is where they probably
> show you the door and tell you to leave.
oh hell! no, you hire someone who is a professional inspector. they do what
they need to in order to ensure me the foundation is sound. the owner
happily kicks back and lets them do their thing.
i did all of this earlier this year. this is my second home. you are still
in diapers and are in no position to know where to even start and what it
all entails.
>>> With websites it's a little easier since one can see live,
>>> working examples of the sites you've got. In your case that would be
>>> NONE, so obviously you would not be the person to trust to make a web
>>> site.
>
>>well, you may happily go to several fortune 50 companies and see my work.
>>catapillar, audi, bmw, toyota, porche, forbes, i can go on...i've been at
>>this game a long time, noobie.
>
> Uh huh, and I'm sure you've even designed websites for the Queen of
> England herself!
no, just the ones i listed plus a few more less notable f50's.
> ...you uh, just can't seem to recall what the site addresses are, huh?
> Oh, no, wait, let me guess, they're a sekrat and teh government will
> like snipe you as you sleep if you reveal your true web developer
> identity!
well, numbnuts, if you put a fucking DOT COM at the end of most of those i
listed you will be amazed that you find a working url. get a brain,
scarecrow!
> ...yeah, it's pretty easy to talk shit when aren't faced with the
> inconvenience of actually having to back up any of your fuckwitted
> lies, huh Junior?
DOT COM...try it, it's fun.
>>> And your lil boyfriend Brendan wouldn't be a good choice either
>>> since all his sites look like some piece of shit presoviet web design.
>
>>i suppose the presence of care bears on his site with an add for diapers
>>would have gotten him a muuuuch higher OMH rating...LOL.
>
> LOL<COCK SLAP>
sorry, did you say something fetish-boi?
>>> I didn't mention it you fuckwit, I linked right to a working model:
>>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/URAMORON.swf
>
>>sorry, by 'working' do you mean the gray area i'm seeing in
>>thunderbird...or
>>the X is see in IE on my pc that doesn't have flash...or in IE when
>>javascript is diabled?
>
> Your CHOI<COCK SLAP>
sorry, i was yawning when you were saying something...what did i miss?
>>> It's done in Flash 6, so anything that works with Flash 6 (which is
>>> essentially everything but Lynx) will work with it. And no, you can't
>>> use Lynx as your backpedal since Brendan's ripped off CSS code won't
>>> render in Lynx (nor will render in IE 5 on the Mac and various others
>>> that will work with Flash 6).
>
>>that was not his point.
>
> Or your <COCK SLAP>
man, i gotta get more sleep. i wasn't paying attention. what did you say?
>>you being functionally illiterate, let me 'splain'
>>to you...he meant that flash doesn't work on everything.
>
> You disabling or not installing Flash does not negate the fact that it
> WILL work on your OS/browser combo you fuckin retard.
doesn't negate the fact that *I* am the client and *I* don't let any site
tell me how to configure *MY* machine. if i run into a site that tries to
force feed me shit (like yours), i move to the next. it's not like there
aren't THOUSANDS of other properly written sites that do what yours WANTS to
do. you certainly aren't the only game in town and are faaaaar from even
being close to best game in town.
after you get your site tracker, pay attention to your home page. that will
be the extent of 90% of the depth of a person's browsing of your site. next,
reduce that number by at least 50% as those will be web crawlers and search
bots indexing your pages - if you knew how to program, you'd be able to find
out which was which...but i digress. you're going to see, you're offering
something people couldn't care less about - much the same as their personal
relationship with you.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|