| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Brendan Gillatt on 10/09/07 15:13 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 
Hash: SHA1 
 
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote: 
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:53:39 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter 
> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote: 
>  
>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:35:27 +0100, Brendan Gillatt 
>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote: 
>> 
>>>> *snicker* 
>>>> 
>>>> You retard!  That won't even work on IE 5 on teh Mac! 
>>> And how does that have a higher percentage of users than those which 
>>> cannot use flash? 
>> Um, retard, Flash works just peachy on IE 5 on teh Mac...maybe not 
>> Flash 9, but you can go as low as Flash 4...actually maybe even lower, 
>> but I haven't personally tested it so I won't say for certain.  Unlike 
>> you, I don't run the fuck at the mouth about shit I don't know about. 
>> 
>> Since the percentage of IE5 Mac users who can view your rendition 
>> is...ZERO...obviously the Flash method is superior.  Again though, yer 
>> not so good with the numbers, what with how you think users are 
>> somehow magically spacing their access apart on yer server to achieve 
>> a nice median hit rate. 
>> 
>>>> Not to mention: 
>>>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/URAMORON.swf 
>>>> 
>>>> LOL, you can achieve the same effect in Flash with NO HTML or CSS code 
>>>> and it's ONLY 280 bytes...that's a nearly FORTY PERCENT reduction in 
>>>> size from yer idiot bloat code! 
>>> So, sorry - I did leave the code un-optimised. By changing the names to 
>>> single characters and removing whitespace I'd probalby get close 
>> This is the part where you won't actually do it because you know 
>> you're full of shit.  Removing all the white space in "your" code (and 
>> by "your" I mean the guy you ripped it off of) wouldn't really have 
>> any significant impact at all on the overall size. 
>  
> Just to prove how stupid you are, I went ahead and removed all the 
> white space from "your" code.  I also removed just about every 
> possible bit of extraneous code and this is the best that can be 
> achieved: 
> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/protal.html 
>  
> 654 Bytes, still about twice the size of mine 
 
With probably at least 200 times more operating systems/browsers that 
can view the text in a readable way. 
 
- -- 
Brendan Gillatt 
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk 
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk 
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBACD7433 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) 
 
iD8DBQFHC5qqkA9dCbrNdDMRAjEHAJ9SuE/oXmUEcgQE8erpUTzR7nl1pACfd8b9 
gTbp4ehUiW2ME/lWefKJUgY= 
=96AN 
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |