Posted by Blinky the Shark on 10/10/07 02:05

Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> Travis Newbury wrote:
>> On Oct 9, 5:01 pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net> wrote:
>>> I am not against flash, any more than images or other media (well maybe
>>> background music!!!!). All have their place. What I am saying is that
>>> flash, at least at this state, is not a replacement for html.
>>
>> No, it isn't. But does that mean that we should be regulated on where
>> and how we use it?
>>
> The gods wont strike your down if your make an all flash site where html
> would be more appropriate, but your may pay a price...

Like, for instance, people avoiding it?

--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project - http://improve-usenet.org

• Next in forum: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news
• Prev in forum: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news
• Thread view: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news

[Reply to this message]