|
|
Posted by Steve on 10/10/07 16:16
"Brendan Gillatt" <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote
in message news:ht6dnc9RyuXOa5HanZ2dnUVZ8qLinZ2d@pipex.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:19:05 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
>>> news:0ipmg31nlu5cdbbvavrgad5ub04kai8mk8@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:30:18 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>>>>> message
>>>>> news:jt1lg396pru74b0jh2affmrt5dut9vk3tr@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:35:27 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
>>>>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> You're still a r-tard, Stupid. For all you know all those hits
>>>> happened in the same hour on the same day and the rest of the time it
>>>> got zero hits...yer kinda fuckwitted and stupid like that, huh?
>>> oh no, no...i can say with statistical certainty of 98% that if 500K
>>> hits is
>>> all you get per month, they will NOT be happening all at once...even
>>> within
>>> the same hour.
>>
>> Are you sure, Stupid? Cause the little boy you've been molesting up
>> the ass with your tongue was able to formulate a scenario in which it
>> was more than probable to get an extremely high number of hits in a
>> very short time frame.
>
> He told you that you'd get 500,000 hits in an hour?
apparently it was to hard for him to see 'NOT' and comprehend the rest of
what preceded and followed. ;^)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|