|
|
Posted by asdf on 10/10/07 13:04
"Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
news:db9pg3dc2nd3tunfqoupuhi6d9mn5l6jhp@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:14:11 +1000, "asdf" <asdf@asdf.com> wrote:
>
> (waits patiently for the 'creative snipping')
>
>>[snip boring drivel]
>
> Oh, there it is! ^_^
>
>>God (or your supreme being of choice) help you if you use the same kind of
>>language with your clients/employer that you use here, matey boy. I for
>>one
>>had no difficulty in understanding the term 'sub work'. Hmm... 'people in
>>glass houses'?
>
> Well of course YOU know what "sub work" is, you enjoy being a "bottom"
> in a "dom" relationship, don'tcha "subby"? ^_^
>
No. I am a "primary" provider.
>>In the business world, *of course* you would use the term 'outsourcing'. I
>>am thankful though, that our language is not (yet) wholly defined by what
>>we
>>can find in Google, or in the business world.
>
> Or on the corner of 5th and Main where you apparently whore yourself
> out for "sub work". *nods*
>
Nope. I am expensive. My clients get value for money, though.
>>In short, the term is meaningless management wank.
>
> Wow, for a word so meaningless you sure managed to dribble on a lot
> about it...what was that, like a dozen fuckin paragraphs worth of
> meaning you came up with just for ONE little word? *whistles*
>
You are obviously so emotionally and intellectually retarded that you don't
recognise satire when you see it.
> Too bad you turned right around and contradicted yourself with that
> last statement...sorta made all that other bullshit you typed,
> well...bullshit, eh?
>
uh.... Well... 'bullshit' as you put it was the whole point. I guess you
missed the main game. Has your voice broken yet?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|