|
|
Posted by Steve on 10/10/07 13:46
"Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
news:rhbpg3tcfku0uuqcpmbagqpno3l6sqniu1@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:07:47 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>
>>> Go run a search on "Larry Flint", retard, that's how it would hold up
>>> in court.
>
>>fallacy of conclusion. look that up. now, how does larry flint prove that
>>slandering someone is ok?
>
> How does grass being green prove that grass is green?
>
> See, I can post as stupid as you do! ^_^
hmmmm...as not all grass is green and given the fact that i can show you
non-green grass, i'd have proof that not all grass is green. see how that
works?
other than you were smoking grass when you mentioned larry flint, provider
of you sexual outlet, how does he relate to grass? how does he relate to
your pedestrian behavior of slandering jerry? that is traceable to you, and
there is proof of it. that would not only hold up in court, but would get
you fined or jailed.
again, whatever larry flint does, larry flint does. there has been no legal
precedent associated with flint that would allow your behavior to be upheld
or tolerated.
fallacy of conclusion. fuckwit.
and, no one can look as stupid as you do. you are in a league of your own.
in the encyclopedia under stupid, you find a picture of a retarded looking
fat boi in blue glasses - mathew moulton printed right underneath.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|