|
|
Posted by Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 10/12/07 18:00
Tellor wrote:
> Could I use a few minutes from some experts to critique my newest
> site?
>
> On the design only please; do not bury me with insults about the
> objective of the site ;-)
Did you think the response to one of your other multi-posts was an
insult?
This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Result: Failed validation, 271 Errors
> it's a tool to build websites for free for the beginner user <grin>
Should such a tool teach beginners to build pages with 271 errors? I
think not. Besides, your page is hard to read, with the low-contrast
gray on white text, and microfonts.
Stuff like this:
<p>Extremely Stable, fast and secure <br>
Works totally on Javascript and html; Ajax is in the works, no need to
worry about Applets or ActiveX being used.</p>
...should be marked up as headings and paragraphs, or a list.
See this, too:
http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm#xpost
--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|