|
|
Posted by Wings on 10/13/07 18:50
"Neredbojias" <monstersquasher@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99C851FF956C4nanopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161...
> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:18:39
> GMT Wings scribed:
>
>>> Grey area, but I do sort of agree. It's pretty bad practice -- and
>>> wouldn't work in any of MY sites... I have breakout code in all my
>>> sites to prevent anything we work on being re-framed by a 3rd party.
>>>
>> I'm not advocating anything here - just want to alleviate my
>> ignorance... What's bad about your site being framed in someone else's
>> site? Wouldn't that increase your site's exposure? I understand that
>> the other site could be making some financial gain from using your
>> site that way, but how does that hurt you instead of help you?
>
> What's bad is that the "hosting" site can associate whatever it wants to
> with the content of your site/page. Would you want a picture of your
> mother located beneath a Hitler-adorned banner stating "Arbeit macht
> frei"?
>
Haha. I got the point. Thanks.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|