|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 10/13/07 18:56
Wings wrote:
> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:doraymeRidThis-20B280.12473313102007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
>> In article <UPCdnc5O65dys43anZ2dnUVZ_qvinZ2d@comcast.com>,
>> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm not advocating anything here - just want to alleviate my
>>>> ignorance...
>>>> What's bad about your site being framed in someone else's site?
>>>> Wouldn't
>>>> that increase your site's exposure? I understand that the other site
>>>> could
>>>> be making some financial gain from using your site that way, but how
>>>> does
>>>> that hurt you instead of help you?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You mean using YOUR bandwidth to give someone else credit for YOUR
>>> content is good?
> But near as I can see the same bandwidth is being used whether one is
> looking at your site in a frame on someone else's site as is used if they
> are at your site directly. I'm still missing something here...
>
>
>
When they're looking at your site, they know they're looking at your site.
If I frame your site in mine, they think they're looking at my site and
my content.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|