| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Steve on 10/15/07 00:47 
<danielcarrington4@gmail.com> wrote in message  
news:1192314042.444297.15850@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com... 
> On Oct 13, 12:51 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote: 
>> <danielcarringt...@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>> 
>> news:1192296003.510114.17510@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com... 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > On Oct 12, 9:24 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote: 
>> >> "Drew" <whoisthatmasked...@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
>> 
>> >>news:4710047c$0$4996$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... 
>> 
>> >> > Steve wrote: 
>> >> >> "Drew" <whoisthatmasked...@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
>> >> >>news:470ff10d$0$20614$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... 
>> >> >>> Damn, Steve. Put your religious beliefs aside and read the  
>> >> >>> metaphor. 
>> 
>> >> >> my lack of religious beliefs aside, what then, was the metaphor i 
>> >> >> missed? 
>> >> >> i thought i showed i understood the metaphore and drew the  
>> >> >> contrasts 
>> >> >> at 
>> >> >> the same time. sup? 
>> 
>> >> > Who's neck is the noose around? 
>> 
>> >> > Who is the recipient of masterfully laid snares? 
>> 
>> >> > What heathen is raging? 
>> 
>> >> > What "murderer" has fallen into his own creation? 
>> 
>> >> the 'heathen' of course. that would technically be the godless or 
>> >> irreligious. and though really the comment was aimed at all  
>> >> participating 
>> >> in 
>> >> the current thread, i pay particular attention to religious babble and 
>> >> actually fit the definition. so, aside from condecending to the entire 
>> >> list 
>> >> of participants for our 'raging' - which the religious tend to like to 
>> >> do, 
>> >> condecend that the rest of us just don't 'get it' and their morals are 
>> >> far 
>> >> superlative to other mortals' - i think the analogy is full of logical 
>> >> holes 
>> >> and is merely drivel. now if the kook wants to defend his position, i 
>> >> invite 
>> >> it. 
>> 
>> >> > Pay attention. 
>> 
>> >> yes, please do. why you're jumping in to say i missed the point, when  
>> >> i 
>> >> clearly got it, is beyond me. 
>> 
>> > You're taking it too literally. Think metaphorically. 
>> 
>> > Think back to the days when you read "Canterbury Tales" in school and 
>> > you'll get it. :) 
>> 
>> omg, eod 
> 
> I'm government, son, you'll have to school me in what "eod" means. 
> 
> In my world it usually means "Explosive Ordnance" detection, division, 
> disposal, deployment .... usually anything that blows up. :) 
 
i'm not your son and am probably your senior...please...no need to try and  
condecend. 
 
it means end of discussion. 
 
cheers.
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |