|
|
Posted by Harlan Messinger on 10/16/07 11:55
bbxrider wrote:
> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:doraymeRidThis-45991F.12055616102007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
>> In article <58GdnYqVd5umi4nanZ2dnUVZ_rGrnZ2d@comcast.com>,
>> "bbxrider" <bxtrap01@job1data.com> wrote:
>>
>>> thanks very much for your quick replies, now i validate
>>> as far as transitional, i thought it gave more latitude in coding
>>> but if there is good reason not to use it i won't
>>> is there a quick explanation or a link you can suggest so i can
>>> understand
>>> it
>>> better or in my case just understand it :-)
>>> thanks again
>>> bob
>> You might read:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/intro/intro.html
>>
>> It's not too bad.
>>
>> Please don't top post
> thanks, sorry bout the post
So why did you do it again? Er--maybe you don't know what "top post"
means. On Usenet you ought to place your reply AFTER the bit you're
replying to so that people reading the post can follow it in a logical
manner. This becomes especially important if a post is long and you want
to respond to different parts of it in different places.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|