|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 10/16/07 16:57
Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:NZqdncE6nNtVLInanZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Steve wrote:
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>> news:i7adnV5K8dHWvonanZ2dnUVZ_urinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:kqednQyGiYzxa47anZ2dnUVZ_qLinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>> bb90125@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On Oct 14, 11:11 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> bb90...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I read below a claim that Jerry Stuckle is a registered sex
>>>>>>>>> offender,
>>>>>>>>> and that he molested someone. If this is true, doesn't this make
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> want to just punch him right in the face?
>>>>>>>>> I hate people who molest or harm children.
>>>>>>>> ROFLMAO, danielcarringt...@gmail.com!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're even more stoopid than most trolls!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe we outta take up a collection to pay OMH's plane fair down to
>>>>>>>> Florida. The two of you should get along quite well together.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Both of you have your heads up your asses!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>>>> Remove the "x" from my email address
>>>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>> JDS Computer Training Corp.
>>>>>>>> jstuck...@attglobal.net
>>>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>>> Shut your mouth, sir.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ROFLMAO! Hit a sore spot, did I?
>>>>> this is getting lame, jerry. don't these idiots have anything better to
>>>>> do? i suppose that's a rhetorical question though.
>>>> No, they don't, Steve. Can't you see that? Their only life is on
>>>> usenet. They have no personal contact with people - people don't want to
>>>> be around them.
>>> i suppose small minds require even less stimuli to warrant entertainment.
>>>
>>> cheers.
>> Yea, it really makes me wonder what their lives are like.
>
> non-existent. ;^)
>
>> I mean, we know Matthew hasn't had a date in over 10 years. And this
>> "Daniel Carrington" (one of these days when I have some time I'll track
>> down his real name) probably isn't any better.
>
> to what end though? flaming is sufficient.
>
>> But after his employer finds the stuff he's been posting on usenet he'll
>> probably be out of a job. And he'll blame me for that, also.
>
> do you know of any employers who 1) google their employees, and 2) take into
> consideration what is being done on said employee's personal time? i don't
> work there and am not sure he does either.
>
>> These buys never learn, and they never take responsibility for their own
>> actions.
>
> omh posting slanderous material on the net is certainly grounds for
> prosecution and will get him a nice fine. i was suprised you didn't pursue
> that. a good joke would be to create a pseudo-summons and mail it to his
> house. ;^)
>
> as for the others posting here...i consider it all fun and games.
>
>
>
Naw, he isn't worth it. I wouldn't get enough to pay the attorney's fees.
As for the joke, yes, it would be fun. But that would just bring me
down to his level.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|