|
Posted by Rik Wasmus on 10/17/07 07:38
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:08:46 +0200, Sanders Kaufman <bucky@kaufman.net>
wrote:
> "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:op.tz95o8an5bnjuv@metallium.lan...
>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:51:32 +0200, The Natural Philosopher <a@b.c>
>> wrote:
>
>>> If you can stand resubmitting the whole page very time you want to
>>> change something, php (Pretty Hopeless Parser) generating images and
>>> poking them in specific areas is oK ish.
>>>
>>> Your call
>>> What you REALLY want is to write your own plugin...;-)
>>
>> Everything written in Assembly... Hmmmmm. Be sure to code your own HTTP
>> server as well, who needs this bloated apache/omnihttp/iis/whatever shit
>> :P
>
> Yeah - he hit me with that one a while back, too.
> Take's all kinds.
Just to keep thing in perspective: PHP is hardly quick and has a
reasonable large footprint. If speed, accuracy, and minimum traffic/load
times are that important in a project, one might indeed consider wether e
'web-interface' is what's needed. A simple dedicated application could be
what's best, or the twilight zone in between using java aplets for
instance.
Writing for the web/UA's has it's drawbacks and advantages one should
realise.
--
Rik Wasmus
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|