|
|
Posted by Erwin Moller on 10/25/07 08:55
Steve wrote:
<snip>
>>
>> Bullshit? More pots of coffee?
>>
>> If you want to appear smart, you better first read the other response I
>> wrote in this same thread many hours ago.
>> It contained a better solution. One that actually works and solves the OP
>> problem.
>
> oh, you mean this:
>
> /a[^b]*b/
Yes.
>
> still missing a ? after the * ... unless you want mixed results.
I have no clue what you are talking about.
What 'mixed results'?
I don't pretend to be a regex expert, so could you give me an example
please where the results differ?
So where gives
/a[^b]*b/
gives a different result than
/a[^b]*?/
>
> /a[^b]*?b/
>
> is appropriate. it may have worked with the test string, but not hardly a
> catch-all in the real world. since the op was confused about *?, your
> snippet pattern doesn't server to clear any of that up.
>
>
>> I fixed my own nonsense with a good solution that works in the other
>> response.
>> Will you do the same and fix the insulting crap you wrote about me in
>> here?
>
> no...but i did justify my comment further. ;^)
>
And you are definitely in a better mood than yesterday.
I saw you piss on more people yesterday in here....
Regards,
Erwin
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|