|
Posted by Sanders Kaufman on 10/26/07 15:45
"Michael Fesser" <netizen@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:ln62i3lqd5fht72k6qafuj5h1o03qjdrgk@4ax.com...
> .oO(Sanders Kaufman)
>>It's odd - how you start by arguing that the string IS the algoritm.
>>And END by arguing that it simply *represents* the algorithm.
>
> Hairsplitting.
When dealing with complex, math concepts - hairsplitting is NO sin.
Indeed - it's an intellectual imperative.
If you would prefer a less precise form of dialogue, you may want to
consider a less precision-demanding topic.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|