|
Posted by Rik Wasmus on 10/29/07 19:27
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:04:46 +0100, Steve <no.one@example.com> wrote:
> complexity is !=3D=3D security. simplicity most assuredly *is*.
Hmmm, that's nonsense offcourse. Simplicity makes it easier to secure =
things and spot possible threads. Simplicity itself offers no security =
whatsoever. I agree that a KISS method surely is the way to go however. =
=
Bloated 'I can do everything'-classes are only usefull for those ill =
equipped to write a method of their own or maybe stretched for time.
-- =
Rik Wasmus
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|