|
|
Posted by Jedi Fans on 10/24/94 11:22
cosmic foo wrote:
> "Jedi Fans" <"news[at]jedifans[--=dot==-]com"> wrote in message
> news:42e64844$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> cosmic foo wrote:
>>> I have a page with about 100 images of about 10k each.
>>> where a typical img tag looks like this,
>>> <img src="item001.jpg" height="70" alt="" onMouseOver="showPic(this)"
>>> border="0">
>>> Not all the images need to be viewed at once, depending on what category
> is
>>> selected, only about 10 images are seen at any one time.
>>> I hide and show categories of images by setting a div container
>>> display:none/block or visibility:hidden/visible.
>>>
>>> Even though the images are cached on the client, when the page loads in
> ie,
>>> there is still a few seconds delay while it counts down until there are
> no
>>> items remaining.
>>> In firefox there is the same delay but instead of counting down it just
> says
>>> 'waiting for..'
>>>
>>> From what i understand, the way to get around this delay when loading is
> not
>>> to set the src of the image tags until later, when the images need to be
>>> viewed (using javascript).
>>> That's not a problem and i have tried it, and it works, but now (for
> some
>>> reason) the browser forgets that the images have been cached whenever
> the
>>> user returns to the site, and has to download the images from the
> server,
>>> the first time a particular category of images is viewed.
>>> This, i presume, is happening because the src attribute is no longer
>>> hard-coded in the source, and the browser cannot associate an entry in
> the
>>> cache with the src of an image that is set via javascript?
>>>
>>> So it looks like the only solution may be to generate the html on the
> fly,
>>> when it is needed, with the src intact, or to use frames to get the html
>>> when it is needed.
>>>
>>> Am i missing something here?
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> please dont cross post
>
> ?
>
>
>
>
dont post the same or similar message to multi newsgroups, as it wastes
peoples time...
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|