Posted by Tomasz Chmielewski on 11/03/07 11:35

Roy A. schrieb:

>> In Firefox and Seamonkey we just don't have any blank space (specified
>> by height and width), so website look will likely break without an image.
>
> That's true. But why don't you supply an image? Don't use images as an
> plaseholder, maybe that's the reason.

I "discovered" it pretty accidentally.

I was trying to find out why a 100% HTML/CSS-compliant page renders
correctly in Firefox/IE, but looks like crap in Konqueror.
After I removed an image, I noticed that the page starts to look crappy
in exactly the same way in Firefox.


--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org

• Next in forum: Simulating columns?
• Prev in forum: Re: Firefox ignores img height / width?
• Thread view: Re: Firefox ignores img height / width?

[Reply to this message]