|
|
Posted by Red E. Kilowatt on 11/03/07 23:29
Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-sicurity@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message:
1194104947.556407.262420@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com,
> mic...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 3:35 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
>>> This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
>>> websites.
>>> Separate layout from content.
>>>
>>> There's no reason to use tables any more.
>>> Everything can be done with CSS.
>>> Tables are so 2002ish ...
>>>
>>> Do you agree with that?
>>> I don't.
>>> I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
>>> desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
>>> But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS
>>> ...
>>
>> Tables are the easiest
>> If you need something simple use tables
> That's not true. CSS is simple and more powerfull then layout tables.
Simple for you, maybe. I find CSS incomprehensible for anything beyond
specifying fonts and backgrounds, like trying to position boxes within
an overall layout.
And honestly, I don't want to learn, because as far as I'm concerned
tables work fine. Granted, improving the text to mark-up ratio on my
sites would probably help their search engine ranking slightly, but I'd
rather send my time figuring out new ways to make money.
--
Red
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|