|
|
Posted by Bone Ur on 11/03/07 22:44
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:18:32
GMT 1001 Webs scribed:
>> > Do you agree with that?
>>
>> I disagree with anyone who agrees with any absolute statement.
>> Unequivocally.
>>
> Then you have to disagree with absolute positioning as well.
>:)
See, there's the conundrum. Normally, yes, I would likely disagree, but
since I _have_ to disagree, I just can't agree with that, either. Even
agreeing to disagree leaves a sour taste in my mouth so I think I'll just
go off and play Australian.
>> > I don't.
>> > I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
>> > desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
>> > But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS
>> > ...
>>
>> So then your opinion is based on an uncertain foundation. And the
>> point is...?
> No point.
> It was a question, a doubt.
> Let me rephrase it:
> Is the Internet world ready to adapt CSS in all its glory and get rid
> of tables and all that deprecated stuff?
> ... or something like that ...
It depends on how pedantic you are. But a word to the wise: many people
seem to "adapt" (-to or "adopt") much of the w3c's labyrinthine advices
apparently because they are official and/or sound so neat, so my guess
would be "Yeah, the 'Day of the Nerds' is upon us."
--
Bone Ur
Cavemen have formidable pheromones.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|