|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 11/04/07 01:16
Travis Newbury wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2:09 pm, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>> It's not a nightmare if you understand it.
> True, but CSS != fluid design
>
That's not the point. CSS CAN be fluid design. Tables cannot really be
fluid.
>> And if you want something to
>> look *exactly* like you design it, create a PDF.
>
> That is not true at all. While it may not look exactly the same on
> 100% of the visitors, you can design it to look the same on the
> overwhelming majority of visitors. If it were not this way the
> corporate world would be rushing to use fluid design. But they
> aren't, they are using fixed width. Because that is what people want,
> and that is what best suits the corporate world.
>
Read what I said. Then respond with some intelligence.
If it doesn't look "exactly the same on 100% of the visitors", it isn't
exactly the same, is it?
>> I'd prefer to have
>> fluid designs which adjust to the size of the user's window.
>
> And the key to your statement is "I'd prefer...."
>
Not at all. Any *competent* webmaster would be able to do such.
> I prefer fixed width. So why is what I prefer wrong, and what you
> prefer right?
>
So do most graphic designers I know. And that's fine for a piece of
paper. But it's shows complete incompetence on the web, which is a
fluid layout.
> It isn't. It is a preference. Neither of us is right or wrong.
>
>
It is a lack of competence on your part.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|