|
|
Posted by mic123 on 11/04/07 15:16
On Nov 4, 12:33 am, Adrienne Boswell <arb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jonathan N. Little"
> <lws4...@centralva.net> writing in news:7b1b4$472c9f47$40cba7c4$21950
> @NAXS.COM:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > mic...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Nov 3, 3:35 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
> >>> This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
> >>> websites.
> >>> Separate layout from content.
>
> >>> There's no reason to use tables any more.
> >>> Everything can be done with CSS.
> >>> Tables are so 2002ish ...
>
> >>> Do you agree with that?
> >>> I don't.
> >>> I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
> >>> desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
> >>> But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS
> ...
>
> >> Tables are the easiest
> >> If you need something simple use tables
>
> > See if you feel that way after editing a site with a half dozen nested
> > tables with row and column spans...
>
> Yes, without going into the HTML, and having the server write a lot of
> javascript href="javascript('somethingbad')"
>
> I inherited that nightmare a few years ago, all gone now.
>
> --
> Adrienne Boswell at Home
> Arbpen Web Site Design Serviceshttp://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
> Please respond to the group so others can share- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Is CSS faster than tables?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|