|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 11/05/07 00:17
dorayme wrote:
> In article <4uCdnaAAs5pvqLDanZ2dnUVZ_qXinZ2d@comcast.com>,
> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> dorayme wrote:
>>> In article <nIadnR_KOZMCgLDanZ2dnUVZ_v2pnZ2d@comcast.com>,
>>> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tables cannot really be
>>>> fluid.
>>> You have said this twice now but have not indicated what you
>>> mean. A table of tabular data can be very fluid or it can be not
>>> very fluid (because of poor design and the use of fixed widths
>>> etc). So what does it mean to say "cannot be really fluid"?
>>>
>> Let's see you wrap data in a table around a picture, for instance.
>
> Data? Around a picture? In a table? What will it prove to show
> text flowing around a pic in a table cell? If I can show you a
> table with a cell that has a pic in it with text flowing around
> it, will you then give up saying that "tables cannot really be
> fluid"? Are you just going to use the word "really" as a licence
> never to revise your statement and just keep hinting at its truth
> instead of enlarging on it so that what *you* mean is clearer?
>
> Just for the record, I do not think it is a good idea in general
> these days to be using tables for making new pages (using them
> for tabular data is another matter of course).
>
Just for the record - you asked for an example. I gave you one. There
are dozens more.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|