|
|
Posted by Travis Newbury on 11/05/07 11:07
On Nov 3, 8:16 pm, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
> That's not the point. CSS CAN be fluid design. Tables cannot really be
> fluid.
So what, sites do not have to be fluid.
> Read what I said. Then respond with some intelligence.
> If it doesn't look "exactly the same on 100% of the visitors", it isn't
> exactly the same, is it?
100% the same is irrelevant in the big picture. That is my point.
> >> I'd prefer to have
> >> fluid designs which adjust to the size of the user's window.
> > And the key to your statement is "I'd prefer...."
> Not at all. Any *competent* webmaster would be able to do such.
In your opinion.
> > I prefer fixed width. So why is what I prefer wrong, and what you
> > prefer right?
> So do most graphic designers I know. And that's fine for a piece of
> paper. But it's shows complete incompetence on the web, which is a
> fluid layout.
In your opinion...
> > It isn't. It is a preference. Neither of us is right or wrong.
> It is a lack of competence on your part.
Funny, I see it the opposite.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|