|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 11/05/07 11:11
Travis Newbury wrote:
> On Nov 3, 8:16 pm, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>> That's not the point. CSS CAN be fluid design. Tables cannot really be
>> fluid.
>
> So what, sites do not have to be fluid.
>
>> Read what I said. Then respond with some intelligence.
>> If it doesn't look "exactly the same on 100% of the visitors", it isn't
>> exactly the same, is it?
>
> 100% the same is irrelevant in the big picture. That is my point.
>
>>>> I'd prefer to have
>>>> fluid designs which adjust to the size of the user's window.
>>> And the key to your statement is "I'd prefer...."
>> Not at all. Any *competent* webmaster would be able to do such.
>
> In your opinion.
>
>>> I prefer fixed width. So why is what I prefer wrong, and what you
>>> prefer right?
>> So do most graphic designers I know. And that's fine for a piece of
>> paper. But it's shows complete incompetence on the web, which is a
>> fluid layout.
>
> In your opinion...
>
>>> It isn't. It is a preference. Neither of us is right or wrong.
>> It is a lack of competence on your part.
>
> Funny, I see it the opposite.
>
>
Yep, and obviously you're completely incompetent. You've already proven
that multiple times.
No go troll someplace else.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|