|
|
Posted by Ciaran on 11/05/07 12:11
On Nov 5, 4:03 am, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article
> <1194228373.934654.162...@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
> Ciaran <cronok...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 1:53 am, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <1194225321.382123.33...@o38g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > Ciaran <cronok...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Ideally, real working columns are what I want but any comprimise that
> > > > works is of interest.
>
> > > Which you have ever really properly explained. What are all the
> > > characteristics of "real working columns" in plain English even
> > > if you do not know how to achieve them on a webpage?
>
> > Well as I said, any solution that breaks the information into columns
> > so it can be displayed across the page as well as just down the page
> > would be good.
>
> You see, this is either really easy or very hard depending on
> quite what you want and quite how many downsides you are prepared
> to buy. If you want very clever and are prepared to go to a lot
> of trouble (unless you are already skilful in server side
> programming?), study what Adrienne has said about server side.
> You still will have to sort out a lot of requirements. If your
> lists are in a sort of order, and are of different lengths this
> adds to the complexity.
>
> Consider again the advice I gave you before which does not mean
> you should no have columns but rather that you should use the
> columns for other purposes than to distribute the lists, you
> could include a navigation list in another column. You can give
> other information in yet another. I would bet quids on this being
> the least trouble for both you and your page customers. There is
> nothing they could not understand this way.
>
> I feel I am nagging you now. Good luck anyway.
>
> --
> dorayme
Ha ha ha not to worry - I'll think of something! Thanks for the
support!
Ciarán
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|